In Cassis de Dijon the Court of Justice of the European Union, in identifying indistinctly applicable rules: European Law Assignment, UO, UK

University University of Oxford (UO)
Subject European Law

In Cassis de Dijon the Court of Justice of the European Union, in identifying indistinctly applicable rules, saw the need to allow Member States a wider margin of discretion in justifications they might impose in their national laws in order to take the potential restriction of trade outside the application of what is now Article 34 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

In many cases, the source of national barriers to trade is product requirements. Critically analyze the above statement in light of what, if any, are the exceptions to the free movement of goods outside those laid down in Article 36 TFEU that have been allowed by the Court of Justice of the European Union. Based on your analysis, in your opinion has the Court’s jurisprudence been consistent?

Are You Looking for Answer of This Assignment or Essay

Looking for reliable assignment writing help in the UK? Look no further! Our expert team is here to provide top-quality assistance. Whether you need assignment help online or specialized support like Law Assignment Help, we’ve got you covered. UK students studying at the prestigious University of Oxford (UO) can rely on our services for their European Law assignments. Our dedicated assignment helpers will guide you through the intricate aspects of Cassis de Dijon, where the Court of Justice of the European Union identifies indistinctly applicable rules. Don’t stress over your assignment, pay our experts and ensure your success in your coursework at UO, UK.

Answer

Do You Need Assignment of This Question